Who mentions $AMC most on Surfaced?

$MU +$5.02B. Zero sells. The largest zero-sell print in the history of the series. S&P at all-time highs. Average ticket: $17,142. The highest we've ever recorded. This is pure institutional positioning at the highest conviction level we've seen. $15.5B in buy blocks. $11.0B in sells. Net flow: +$4.56B. 13,879 prints. The buyers. Supply chain. $MU +$5.02B (3,466 blocks, ZERO SELLS) $QQQ +$1.70B (1,760 blocks) $AMD +$1.01B (626 blocks, $43M in sells) The sellers. Platforms. $AAPL -$1.12B (277 blocks) $MSFT -$878M (315 blocks, $141M buys vs $1.02B sells) $SPY -$826M (818 blocks) $NVDA -$818M (1,275 blocks) $AVGO -$208M (217 blocks) $MU: +$5.02B with zero sell blocks across 3,466 prints. Not one institutional seller. The largest zero-sell print in the history of the series. On May 8, $MU printed +$13.4B with zero sells. On May 18, $MU printed -$4.55B with zero buys. Today: +$5.02B with zero sells again. $MU is the most one-directional name on the tape. When it moves, there is zero opposition. $AMD: +$1.01B with $43M in sells. Effectively zero opposition. The second consecutive session of near-zero sell interest in $AMD. The supply chain vs platform split is the defining trade of the post-$NVDA era. The institutions are buying what benefits from AI capex spending ($MU for memory, $AMD for compute, $QQQ for broad Nasdaq). They're selling the platforms that spend the capex ($NVDA, $MSFT, $AAPL, $AVGO). $NVDA: -$818M. Third straight post-earnings sell session. Cumulative -$7.2B since the beat. The $NVDA sell-the-news trade shows no sign of slowing. $MSFT: -$878M with $141M in buys. Fourth straight session being sold with near-zero buyer interest. $MSFT has been on the sell side with minimal buy interest every day since $NVDA earnings. The $MSFT distribution is quiet but persistent. $AAPL: -$1.12B. Flipped from Friday's +$1.26B buy. The Apple trade is volatile. Buy one day, sell the next. $SPY: -$826M on a day the S&P hit all-time highs. The index made a record high and the institutions sold it. The familiar pattern: price goes up, institutions sell into strength. Average ticket at $17,142 is the highest ever. When the average block trade is $17K, the positioning is institutional, not retail. For context, $AMC's average ticket was $289 today. The trade is clear. Buy memory and compute. Sell platforms and indexes. The $NVDA earnings confirmed $91B in Q2 AI capex. The institutions are positioning in the names that receive that spending, not the names that do the spending. The tape doesn't have an opinion. It has a receipt.

Open on X

@unusual_whalesMay 19, 2026 · 9:16 PM

JUST IN: AMC Entertainment, $AMC, CEO Adam Aron purchased 250,000 shares of the company's Class A common stock. https://t.co/y3VKAtfkkw

Open on X

@acinvestorblogMay 19, 2026 · 8:26 PM

$AMC Insider buying - CEO purchased 250,000 shares at $1.37 https://t.co/Z7ihmfxnLI

Open on X

@unusual_whalesMay 5, 2026 · 8:29 PM

$AMC earnings: - EPS: -$0.22, est: -$0.35 - Revenue: $1.0 billion, est: $968 million $OXY earnings: - EPS: $1.06, est: $.059 - Revenue: $5.1 billion, est: $5.6 billion

Open on X

@dustinhuntwnApr 28, 2026 · 2:08 AM

$AMC we are at the point where dilution creates a higher floor for the stock price because the fundamentals are improving. They escaped the death spiral financing especially if movies deliver this year. This will make Ken put a bullet in his head before a short squeeze. It's the GameStop formula. Use retail enthusiasm to dilute and piss everyone off. Everyone calls it a scam except APES NEVER LEAVE meaning the dilution is slowly improving the balance sheet. The price is being suppressed by Naked Shorting but it's ALL blamed on dilution. IN REALITY the dilution is helping more than seen but the naked shorting makes it. then once a big price increase happens like from under a dollar to 1.60 the balance sheet and the stock price start making the shorts under a dollar look....wrong. Then you realize one roaring kitty return and we can not only go to double digits but AMC can at the same time raise hundreds of millions of dollars. The floor raises, shorts are trapped...repeat forever.

Open on X

@investmentguru_Apr 25, 2026 · 12:09 PM

Longs always win. Here’s why time destroys shorts: - Time Is A Short Seller’s Enemy Every day a short is open → borrowing fees tick up Options decay against them The market can stay irrational longer than they can stay solvent - Markets Have A Built-In Upward Bias S&P 500 is up ~10% annually on average over 100 years Companies retain earnings, innovate, expand Inflation alone pushes nominal prices higher Shorts are literally fighting compounding - The Asymmetry Is Brutal For Shorts → Max gain for a short = 100% (stock goes to $0) → Max loss for a short = INFINITE (no ceiling on price) Longs? Unlimited upside. Capped downside. - Short Squeezes Are Real $GME. $AMC. $TSLA. $MSTR. Shorts get squeezed out. Longs get paid. One squeeze can erase years of short profits in days. - Even “Bad” Companies Recover $AAPL was left for dead in the 90s $AMZN was a “dot-com bubble stock” in 2001 $NVDA was a gaming chip company nobody cared about Patience + conviction > short thesis every time The Bottom Line: Shorts need to be RIGHT → on direction → on timing → on magnitude Longs just need to be RIGHT on direction and patient Time does the rest.

Open on X

@investmentguru_Apr 21, 2026 · 10:16 AM

$CAR $BYND $BB $BULL $OPEN $AMC $GME $SOUN $HIMS — all showing characteristics of short squeeze material. These names typically carry elevated short interest, and when volume + momentum step in, shorts get trapped, leading to forced covering that pushes prices even higher. It becomes a feedback loop — price goes up → shorts cover → price accelerates further. Most of these are also retail-heavy, sentiment-driven stocks where momentum matters more than fundamentals in the short term. Tight floats, high borrow costs, and sudden spikes in volume are the key ingredients. The play: identify early momentum, ride the squeeze, and scale out into strength — because once the covering slows, these moves can fade just as fast.

Open on X

@tradableastroApr 21, 2026 · 3:46 AM

$AMC https://t.co/D4Jbfix6p3

Open on X

@alphaticaioApr 10, 2026 · 5:20 PM

Yesterday they bought $17.6 billion. Today they're selling. The institutional tape flipped. $619M in sell blocks vs $298M in buys. Net flow: −$321M. First net-sell reading since we started sharing this data. Where the institutions are selling: $SPY −$151M (155 blocks) $AMD −$73M (31 blocks) $META −$57M (30 blocks) $QQQ −$43M (48 blocks) $DIA −$39M (23 blocks) $TSLA −$38M (37 blocks) The only institutional buyers in the entire tape: $RKLB +$104M (2 blocks — $52M avg per print) $NVDA +$84M (67 blocks) That's it. Two names buying. Everything else is red. SPY alone: $151M in sell blocks across 155 prints. That's roughly $1M per print, hitting the bid all afternoon. Meanwhile the average ticket on $AMC: $337. On https://t.co/vih5yNoXCa : $998. Yesterday the tape told you to buy. Today it's telling you something different. Same system, same data, opposite signal. Volume tells you activity. The tape tells you who. And today, who is leaving.

Open on X

@aleabitoredditApr 6, 2026 · 8:55 PM

@Kaizen_Investor Yes if you were $GME, $AMC CEO’s a logical choice might be to dump ATMs on a retail shareholders to benefit the company because they would take it. However $IREN bagholders or meme stocks, I would not personally just sit there and get diluted from around double the 52m share float. I hope it doesn’t pass since it’s stupid. They already raised enough from Northland and this is predatory

Open on X

@aleabitoredditApr 5, 2026 · 6:53 AM

@Jacktecau990 $SOFI as a company is fine. I think the X community logic behind banks banning competitors from offering yield… Making Wells Fargo checking accounts more competitive than 4% APY stablecoin banks. Might take the lead as the highest IQ take? Or maybe the $AMC dilution to wipe out shareholders as a way to 20x the share price might be smarter?

Open on X

@aleabitoredditApr 5, 2026 · 6:13 AM

Who are the smartest investors on X? In the lineup we have $SOFI, $AMC, $IREN, and $BYND.

Open on X

@aleabitoredditMar 29, 2026 · 7:58 AM

$IREN filed to dilute $6,000,000,000 at a $11.7B MC. That is not noise. This is Iren's way to monetize their 4.5GW capacity by selling all those new shares onto the open market. If you want some history on how this turns out: Look at $BKKT that crashed 99% with Mike and $IREN board of directors history with excessive ATMs. Or his recent company $ASST. It’s accretive to the company and executives: Because it wipes out all retail shareholders and they can always issue SBC. So they don’t actually care what stock price it needs to be at to sell. After they’re finished, they have $6B in new cash to use for scaling without paying interest. But the reason why convertible notes with interest, and $NVDA funding balance sheets is much better for retail capital: Is because it doesn’t wipe out retail equity to achieve this. Because at this point $IREN looks like the $AMC of datacenters with a dwindling moat, and looming $6B in shares sold into the open market. Reason I post about $IREN is because - people dismiss a $6B ATM as “Noise” - it’s one of the most popular retail “buy the dip” companies that they’re buying into a $6B dilution machine - people still don’t understand the risk at all. - the amount they have now is not enough to finance GPUs/GW capacity monetization. - they likely will have to use the ATM, it’s not “optionality” Again: I have zero positions in the company. I’m just warning retail investors that this ATM structurally wipes out your equity appreciation by how structural mechanics of $6B+ ATMs work. Because $IREN likely needs to sell new shares at any price to monetize their GW, otherwise there would be zero need to file it. Executives actually don't need to care because they can make up for stock price dropping by issuing SBC like $SNAP. If you have to wonder if your equity gets wiped out from an excessive ATM: There are better longs out there than $IREN.

Open on X

@aleabitoredditMar 24, 2026 · 6:34 PM

I’m genuinely impressed there’s people out there holding $IREN. Imagine getting close to half the market cap… ~$6B eventually diluted, sold into the open market against every stock rally… then still being bullish? If you’re avoiding $SNDK or $AAOI for 100-200%+ YTD. Because you care more about a company over your own portfolio returns. You’re in the special $AMC bagholding territory.

Open on X

@aleabitoredditMar 7, 2026 · 7:00 PM

Most people on X make the mistake of getting married to a stock. If your thesis materially changes with $HIMS or $IREN, so should your position. If the bull case with $IREN last year was monetizing 3GW capacity through colo. Then if the company: -> inevitably dilutes you $6B off a $12.2B MC -> sells those shares into the open market in every rally -> pivots to GPU offerings Your thesis has changed. And it’s likely a time to exit to pursue more asymmetric opportunities. If your thesis with $HIMS was that they’re the Amazon of healthcare. But they get sued to oblivion by $NVO and the US gov. It’s respectable to exit. But if the thesis is back online given $NVO dropping their lawsuit and partnering up, then there’s nothing wrong with going long again. A lot of things change every month with catalysts or fundamentals. If you’re still cheering on an inevitable $6B worth of new shares getting sold against your $IREN positions on every rally. And your only qualifier is “Trusting in Management” like $AMC investors. Maybe it’s a good time to ask yourself this: Are you ignoring every red flag because you’re married to the stock?

Open on X

@aleabitoredditMar 6, 2026 · 7:14 PM

@MikeFReichmann If the $IREN community’s main response is to say mentioning the $6B ATM is communist propaganda paid off by the Soviet Union. Sorry to say you’re in $AMC bagholderterritory. https://t.co/mK0TwgxArO

Open on X

@aleabitoredditMar 6, 2026 · 6:53 PM

I see zero compelling case to hold $IREN. Especially given the new $6B share dilution at a $12.8B marketcap. People will likely see that marketcap inflate to $20-$25B. But the value of their shares decrease over time. The risk reward is just not there anymore. Companies like $CIFR offer much more asymmetrical upside given their colo model for $AMZN and $GOOGL through Fluidstack. And companies like $NBIS offer much better diversification (robotaxis, clickhouse), derisked execution, and are well supported for capex. With $IREN, there’s no way to justify being diluted close to half the market cap and cheering that on. Even with a new hyperscaler deal there’s risk reward is just not there. I was bullish $IREN last year but sold it. As holders went from: -> 3GW capacity, asset lite, Colo model (was a fan of this) -> Buying GPUs for $MSFT and cheering on execution risks from the pivot (not a fan) Into -> Cheering on $6B of new share dilution + getting sold on the open market against their positions. (AMC bagholder territory) If you’re trying hard to justify why new ~50% dilution is a good thing sold against your positions and trusting in management: Sorry to tell you, that you’re now in the $AMC equivalent club for datacenters. There are much better longs out there.

Open on X

@aleabitoredditMar 5, 2026 · 12:39 PM

@darth_kirk Only with $IREN and $AMC have I seen investors try to spin their shares getting diluted to oblivion as a positive thing.

Open on X

@gnoble79Feb 22, 2026 · 7:03 PM

I've been relentlessly calling out the grifter @ericjackson. He has led the $OPEN army to slaughter. The $OPEN army has been routed. Destroyed. Obliterated. The casualties have been enormous. If only someone had sounded the alarm ;) The profanity, the ad hominem attacks, the hate - that has been the response of the $OPEN army since September when I first called BS on @ericjackson. The haters have not attempted to justify the valuation. Because they can't. They have not attempted to make a fundamental case based on numbers. Because they can't. They have not attempted to understand the limitations of GAAP accounting and why it must be used with care in analyzing $OPEN. Because they won't. They have not attempted to understand that $OPEN was valued at 8x book value and 25x revenues. Because they could not handle the truth. Instead they cling to the narrative of 83, then 500. They want to pretend that this is 2021 and $OPEN will do an $AMC or $GME. They worship at the altar of narrative, not fundamentals. Peter Lynch would not approve. I tried to help you. I tried to warn you. I come here not to praise the odious charlatan @ericjackson, but to bury him. I will not relent. This is much bigger than Jackson. He epitomizes everything that is wrong with markets. A financially illiterate, unscrupulous charlatan promoting an endless stream of wildly speculative garbage - $OPEN $SRXH $BETR $ABTC $NXDR $BTQ $DEFT $HUT $CIFR $IREN $BRR $SANA Eric is financially illiterate, unethical, irresponsible, and dishonest. History will not be kind to him. Eric, have you no shame? Have you no decency? Have you no honor? Have you no basic knowledge of finance? I call on all people of good conscience to rise up and just say no to all the grifters and charlatans. You know the names: @CathieDWood @APompliano @dilipsinh_barad among many others. The media and podcast world is complicit in all of this as they continue to aid and abet these clowns: @andrewrsorkin @gnoble79 @saraeisen @SullyCNBC @ScottWapnerCNBC @carlquintanilla @cnbcfastmoney @HalftimeReport @SamofAmerica @guyadami @tomkeene @business @ferrotv @lisaabramowicz1 @natbrunell @philrosenn @APompliano @cvpayne @Downtown @baystreetamber @FoxBusiness @JonErlichman @twistartups @CNBC @TheCompoundNews @podcasts @davidlin_TV @YahooFinance @juleshyman @opinion @TheStalwart @brewmarkets @THERUNDOWN The feckless @SECGov has abdicated its responsibility. We must band together to put an end to this nonsense. We must try to restore integrity to markets. There is so much work to be done, but let's start NOW. @DougKass and I have had ENOUGH. We will not relent. This post is not about @ericjackson. Mr. Market is punishing him. Eric Jackson will fall into irrelevancy. This is about living in your integrity. DO SOMETHING ONLY BECAUSE IT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO, NOT JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH IT. Finally, this work of art is priceless. This is about the best rebuttal the haters can offer. That should tell you all you need to know about the $OPEN army. PS - Rabois has aided and abetted the $OPEN pump with his documented lies.

Open on X

@unusual_whalesFeb 9, 2026 · 6:14 PM

AMC Entertainment Holdings, $AMC, announces it is offering up to $150,000,000 of Class A common stock through at-the-market sales and potential collared forward transactions under a new shelf program

Open on X

@acinvestorblogJan 12, 2026 · 9:41 PM

$AMC large call spotted before the close https://t.co/XchkdEFQw6

Open on X

@acinvestorblogJan 9, 2026 · 10:39 PM

$AMC caught my attention today. Strong call options activity. https://t.co/6Zp2OPtT9c

Open on X

@dustinhuntwnJan 9, 2026 · 10:33 AM

Updated institutional ownership: $OSS 41.33% institutional ownership $AMC 56.75% institutional ownership $COIN 69.70% institutional ownership $MARA 90.60% institutional ownership Smart money positioning is worth paying attention to. They probably know something that I don't. https://t.co/GeGG7PIpet

Open on X

@dustinhuntwnDec 26, 2025 · 9:50 AM

Institutional ownership is at all-time highs in these names: $AMC $BBAI $CLSK $BULL Smart money positioning is worth paying attention to. https://t.co/waCVBjzMIF

Open on X

@dustinhuntwnDec 23, 2025 · 9:21 AM

While everyone is crying about $AMC, institutions have been quietly accumulating. In the past month, institutional ownership of $AMC has climbed from 195M to 291M. • 373 long. 3 short. They probably know something that I don't. Watching closely, don't miss out! https://t.co/8DNclibYXG

Open on X

@dustinhuntwnNov 14, 2025 · 4:46 PM

GENIUS GROUP TO FILE NAKED SHORTING LAWSUIT AGAINST SHORT SELLERS TODAY OR TOMORROW!!! GNS MASSIVE NEWS FOR RETAIL 💥💥🤯 $MMTLP $TLRY $BYND $AMC https://t.co/XtUTxBn891

Open on X

$AMC

$AMC

About this stock

Related stocks

Frequently asked