is not part of the NAND bottleneck when Kioxia makes all of it.
But when Sandisk has the ultimate control of output supply, they become the bottleneck + have all the pricing power.
Sivers controls output supply of CW lasers given allocations, and as seen with
$LITE
earnings, CW laser is currently bottlenecked as everyone seems to be stuck producing EMLs.
2. Like how LLMs always uses em-dashes.
You can tell when people use AI when they always use the same "CW is a dumb interchangeable laser" argument or compare "power" specs after conflating different architectures.
That's why your "analysts" using AI will get this wrong over and over.
There's CW lasers... and then there's a specific architectural design that Sivers achieves with DFB lasers.
If you compare power specs with
$LITE
vs. Sivers, Lumentum wins in isolation. But they're completely different laser architectures.
All the leading CPO players like Ayar, chose
1.6T LRO also made one of the most dramatic moats cited by their fireside chat, using Sivers lasers.
If you think CW lasers are interchangeable with Sumitomo/Furukawa, and others. And can be plug-and-play... i don't know what to tell you?
Again:
for 2024-2025 has been going through development contracts. People using TTM revenue or former P/S metrics are using completely the wrong metrics, when there's volume ramp in 2027.
It's the same with
is at today with starting off in the laser chokepoint for CPO:
People are modeling laser revenue off very isolated TAM projections. Meanwhile Sivers is targeting M&A to expand revenue for TAM projections.
This is not a simple component FAU + ramp valuation modeling over with a Taiwanese company.
Since Laser companies like
are known to downstream expand to make their lasers more valuable, then vertically integrate (fabs, assembly) afterward.
Again, Sivers worked with Ayar and these types of companies before they all became billion dollar companies. I have high conviction knowing they know what to acquire down the ELS/optical engine stack + pluggable transceiver for TAM expansion.
It's just annoying when I get people who don't understand the nuances backseat commenting wrong things about my longs.
I got the same thing about
I don't post dollar amounts because they don't matter.
What matters is return %. Speaking of that...
YTD: 3840.39%.
I'm probably the only one in the world. Who called out multiple names that 10x'd in a short timeframe.
Do you remember these thesis anon?
1. $AXTI
2. $SIVE
3. $AAOI
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB
16. $SNDK
17. $SIMO
18. $VPG
19. $TSEM
20. $ARM
21. $MRVL
22. $INTC
23. $LPK
24. $NBIS
25. $MU
They're all up 100-1000%+, because...
1. I post a thesis.
2. People can see how the stock performs months later.
3. They turn out right (thesis validation) because they're up hundreds of percent + hold their returns.
I really dislike the traditional X influencer who shows large dollar amounts or fancy watches/cars/private jets.
Then use that to get more by selling expensive subscriptions rather than through market returns.
So trying to set a new trend off pure information discovery/synthesis from free thesis posts and the results that follow in terms of return percentages.
TLDR: Market returns in terms of percentages matter the most to validate a thesis.
Not the dollar amount made.
People keep asking:
Hey why do have new longs with Taiwan/EU stocks recently like $LPK or Foci?
And not much with new US ones?
It's partly because the list of US stocks I've liked from $INTC to $NBIS hasn't changed.
You can always just let the ones you like grow. https://t.co/ostZWjOAAm
European quantum/optical/glass chokepoints go BRRR?
$ALRIB +8.35%
$LPK +3.21%
$IQE +5.68%
$SOI +4.98%
As a side thought, it’s a nice vote of confidence to retail that the LPKF CEO bought shares off the market.
More CEOs should do the same, even if it’s small. https://t.co/BwxBnd2wDm
When I see comments like this (and there are a lot) from retail investors:
I immediately think they lack the technical depth.
I'll walk through each one from $SIVE to $LPK:
1. Photonics TAM goes from $14B -> $154B In just two years time, and it's likely going to keep scaling past 2030 as it's the next generation architecture of choice.
It's not going away in 1 year. It's not going away in 3 years, which is why $LITE premiums keep going higher since they're backlogged into 2028.
$SIVE supplies CW lasers and is highly tethered to CPO and now pluggable transcivers for 1.6T and 3.2...
For expected companies like $JBL, Ayar, Lightmatter, Lightelligence, $POET, $MRVL Celestial, and $AMD.
This isn't a "trade", it's the core chokepoint and IP holder for the next generation of photonics.
And it's a comfortable hold for the next few years as they scale to become the next $LITE.
The risk I personally see (since they're already qualified with so many players), it's mainly how much TAM they can capture of the overall optical supercycle. (And potential risks with Win Semi volume ramp, but Win is massive so I can sleep tightly there).
As just supplying lasers isn't enough to justify valuation.
It's TAM expansion downward into making the entire ELS or entire pluggable transceiver that makes these laser companies so valuable.
Then afterward, they can vertically integrating upward for gross margin expansion upward like $COHR into doing the laser fabs or even substrate level.
And that in my view is a very asymmetric risk/reward ratio as we've already seen this done with $LITE as they went from $2B to $80B.
2. $LPK - Is the purest exposure, without the messy financials of SKC Absolics, as the next advanced packaging shift for glass substrates.
Almost every single major semi company from $INTC to Samsung are adopting glass substrates.
$LPK is basically $ASML of this chokepoint, since they supply to ~80% of the global players currently.
Yes, there's "trade cycles" for equipment suppliers like $ASML, where if there's more foundry capex, ASML scales up. But if there's downturns, these tend to perform poorly, and don't capture all the volume ramp that happens after.
However, if the MC is $650m and they're making $100-200M, revenue per costumer volume ramped, the amount they make from the glass substrate cycle will likely exceed current valuations.
And they'll have baseline fundamentals (as more companies adopt the packaging shift), that keeps their valuation up.
It's just a waiting game for volume ramp at this point.
3. $AAOI - This is literally $INTC but for America + Photonics. It's like saying Intel is not a long term investment.
Guess where all your optical transcivers are made?
China. Thailand. Malaysia. If you look at Innolight, Eoptolink, $FN, and others.
AOI is building the largest Made in America supply chains for both CW laser fab, as well as 800g, 1.6T assembly.
Yes, there are pluggable cycle ups and downs to this as well. There's going to be a wave for 1.6T next year, then CPO cannibalizes pluggables down the road.
But since they make the entire supply chain in house, they have extreme optionality for other segments. And like $NVDA older gen-GPUs, there's going to be sovereign DC requirements for older gen pluggables from names like $AAOI.
It's likely going to keep rising as it hits that $400m+/month revenue target H2 2026.
There's just a lot of different short term volatility along the way like the $600m dilution.
4. $IQE - ??? It's one of the most important players in the Western word for epiwafers.
$MTSI went out of their way to pay off IQE's debt because they can't have them going under. $IQE is also supplying to $LITE.
The world is currently bottlenecked both on the epiwafer level from Landmark comments and InP substrate levels.
Their financials were track but the raw book value, and value they hold to the entire Western supply chain... completely justifies their valuation. And other optical companies will not let their core upstream supply chain go under.
As these tens of millions worth of materials would screw up tens of billions worth of downstream products.
Again photonics is the next generation architecture required to scale AI. It's not Quantum where it's just "In development".
It's literally here and the architecture of choice by $NVDA.
I would not be surprised if all of these are a lot higher in 3-4 years time.
People who think it's one and done in 3 months time "only because I mentioned it" don't know what they're talking about.
Institutions would have bought up the name eventually (like Point 72 on $IQE) and retail would only find out after their valuations are 600% higher.
Should really do the research before adding comments like these:
These are all forward growth companies that require in-depth supply chain knowledge.
Leopold Aschenbrenner is a legend, but I'm not quite sure he can beat 3152.77% YTD in the Serenity Awareness fund.
That being said, I've hit 23 different longs this year with 100-1000%+ YTD.
1. $AXTI
2. $AAOI
3. $SIVE
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB
16. $SNDK
17. $SIMO
18. $VPG
19. $TSEM
20. $ARM
21. $MRVL
22. $INTC
23. $LPK
Do you remember all of these anon?
I pick a theme I’m extraordinarily bullish on, then I pick the most compelling players to long.
The largest upside theme is CPO over the next two years, I have extraordinarily high confidence in that statement.
I think memory is tail end of supercycle where returns are probably less but still compelling.
Long term 5+ years it’s space and humanoids.
There’s little trades in between like glass substrate shifts with $LPK over next 6 months.
Woah, rough day for Europe.
Looks like everything from $SOI to $LPK and others are down 10-20% from overwhelmingly macro.
Fun thing if war sentiment flips, as they often do with our president… lot of these names should go a lot higher. https://t.co/7JYmFAzcTv
Not sure why people ask these types of questions across every single stock from $AAOI to $LPK under every post?
I've already said multiple times, I have positions after $FLNC earnings announced 2 new hyperscaler deals.
But I do think $FLNC Is compelling since hyperscalers from $GOOGL to $AMZN don't sign small deals in general.
Especially when you look at $MSFT contract with $NBIS a lot of it is a major surprise.
Wall Street haven’t figured $PENG role out yet.. when they do, it will explode.
Here’s everything you need to know and why $NVDA$AAOI$MU$SNDK will need to rely on them, at one point:
$PENG provides the *end-to-end architecture* required to make components work as a unified system.
They design, build, and manage "AI Factories" such as massive data centers optimized for AI training.
Their portfolio covers:
> Computing
> Memory
> Managed Services
They solve the "Memory Wall" (the bottleneck between the processor and data) by owning memory technology and system integration expertise.
And acts as the integrator layer, the "glue" that assembles raw components into a functioning supercomputer.
Penguin’s uniqueness lies at the intersection of Memory and HPC (High-Performance Computing). Most integrators focus only on the compute (GPUs), but Penguin understands that the "Memory Wall" (the speed gap between the processor and the data storage) is the BIGGEST bottleneck in AI. They are one of the few players that own the memory technology (through their SMART Modular brand) and the system-level integration expertise.
To give you an understanding of their position:
Tier 1: Component Providers (The Raw Materials)
$NVDA provides the Blackwell GPUs that serve as the engines of the factory.
$MU provides High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), while $MRAM provides persistent memory for reliability.
$SNDK provides high-speed SSDs, and $P provides the all-flash arrays required to feed massive datasets to GPUs without lag.
$AAOI provides the "nervous system" through 800G and 1.6T optical transceivers that move data between GPUs.
$POET and $SIVE provide photonics to replace copper wires with light-speed links.
$LPK provides precision manufacturing for the circuit boards these components inhabit.
Tier 2: The Architect & Integrator (The Brain)
This is the center. Penguin takes the chips $NVDA, memory $MU, storage $P, and networking $AAOI and "weaves" them together.
They perform the "racking, stacking, and testing".
Tier 3: Infrastructure Operators
$NBIS & $IREN. These are the customers. They build the physical power, shells, and the AI cloud.
They rely on Penguin for the technical deployment and managed services to keep fleets running 24/7.
If the AI revolution is a gold mine, $NVDA and $MU are the pickaxes, $P and $AAOI are the conveyors and bins, $IREN and $NBIS are the ‘owners’, and $PENG Solutions is the engineering firm that builds and manages the entire operation.
-BP
NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE.
I’m considering building a new big LT position within AI infrastructure constraints.
Power, memory, substrates and now glass…
There’s SO many opportunities circulating right now; $LPK$P$PENG$DGXX$MRAM just a few examples.
The industry is moving SO fast.
So, what’s the best cases out there in your perspective?
I need inspirations for my research.
And now $LPK is #19 on the list of my individual stocks that returned 100-1000%+ YTD.
After going up +4.57% today.
Usually 1 or 2 is good, but I’ve written about and went long on 19 different stocks this year that went up triple digits.
I’m kinda impressed with myself ngl? https://t.co/s9FLfTWHGd
“Leading” Glass Substrate players that were name dropped if you’re curious:
• $LPK — TGV Equipment
• $GLW — Glass Materials
• $ASGLY (5201 T)— Glass Materials
• $NIDGY (5214 T) — Glass Materials
• $LRCX — Etching Systems
• $DSCSY (6146 T)— Dicing Equipment
• $SMHSF — Bonding Systems
• $ONTO — Inspection Tools
• $KLAC — Inspection Tools
Fun to see the stuff I’ve called out early in the year like LPK at ~$150m MC get mentioned as a critical player by Trendforce and others.
Just a TLDR of recent semi developments:
1. $TSM pushing hard CoPoS - VisEra/others might go brrr earlier than expected.
2. $AAPL goes with $INTC for semi production, which is a major shift cause they normally go with TSM. Made in America go like Intel go brrr.
3. $NVDA Vera Rubin reportedly makes changes to cooling architectures very recently.
"Taiwan's thermal management suppliers are emerging as one of the fastest-growing segments in the AI hardware ecosystem" - From Last Month.
"Vera Rubin server architecture is expected to drive a fundamental shift in data center cooling and system design"
Will cover thermal ecosystem later, maybe it's time to take a look?
4. 2D NAND shortage spirals after Samsung, Micron, and rivals exit market
Macronix, Windbond go brrr. implications for GigaDevice and other niche players.
5. "Big Tech reportedly offers to fund SK Hynix fabs and EUV"
- Memory that badly bottlenecked that mag7 wants to pay for it, so $MU, SK Hynix, Samsung go brr.
6. $TSM 2026 net revenue $12.6B for April 2026. Revenue up 30%, Semis keep going brr.
7. Anthropic needs compute -> SpaceX.
So implications for compute demand is extreme here which is BRRR $NBIS and others.
But it's very interesting they sidestepped Neoclouds and went with SpaceX.
8. "SKC to Accelerate Mass Production of Glass Substrates for U.S. Clients by the End of the Year"
"the end of the year, ahead of its original plan, it has been announced"
Glass Core substrates players like $LPK for mass production and other related players like SKC go brrr.
Glass timelines moved up. heavy brrr glass.
9. "Power chip shortages deepen as AI server demand and GaN battles escalate"
Maybe time to look into the power chip bottleneck anon?
10. "Adata said DRAM and NAND flash contract prices will each climb more than 40% in the second quarter of 2026"
Another positive for $MU, SK Hynix, Samsung, $SNDK, and others.
Unreal… I’m over halfway there to Elon in subscriber count.
24K more and I’ll be #1 on the entire X platform!
Feels surreal that a random person sharing their thoughts about niche AI ideas from $LPK to $SOI ….
Has a chance to be the most popular one on the largest platform? https://t.co/MsuqG95Y3p
$LPK up 80% in the last two weeks. Not too shabby at ~$687M MC?
It's probably one of the cleaner ways to play the next Glass Substrate supercycle.
50-100 machines per customer at scale, with "start of 2027 as mass production" across likely $INTC, $GLW, SKC, and others (since they captured ~80% of the major players).
Maybe ~€2M average per machine.
€400M–€1B+ across just 5 players in 2027 (could be more)? Since they basically supply to everyone as a chokepoint. Off ~67.6% blended gross margins.
Seems promising for volume ramp wait time.
@CjL0222 No. $LPK is probably my favorite exposure right now since they supply to everyone.
I'm just saying if people are long glass core substrates, Samsung, $INTC, and others are probably a bit bigger.
SKC is probably the lowest MC leader in that space.
Then if you see them succeeding, then HB gets a piggyback + probably ends up supplying yields related stuff to the other players.
I guess, post earnings when $ARM touched $268...
$ARM is now #18 on the individual stock list that I went long on that hit 100%-1000%+ YTD?
I've lost count TBH. Some others like $LPK and $SIMO and $HPS.A are getting really close now.
But feels like I'm one of the few ones out there on X with actual receipts of all the returns + original thesis post.
@tw_crypto_ Yeah $LPK is going in a vertical line up, fun times for the glass ecosystem.
Photonics is down today, but memory + glass helps balance it out.
I feel like institutions are just buying everything glass core substrate related today?
Stuff like:
- Philoptics, limit up
- HB technologies, limit up (SKC supplier)
- YCCHEM +20%
Then there's $LPK over in Europe.
Wonder if I missed any major news.
Honestly not too bad?
Cool to see markets validate my thesis posts…
With $SOI (silicon photonic substrates) to $LPK (glass core substrates) going in a straight line up . https://t.co/yQbidG44we
@jpm7019 $LPK not exactly. $ALMU fits the definition more of speculation just going off development.
$LPK is already dominates a chokepoint and is qualifying with almost every semi.
It’s just guessing what volume ramp looks like for all the semi companies and how that affects MC.
Thoughts on LPKF Laser < $LPK / $LPKFF> earnings:
Very nuanced, here's what markets might have missed:
If you look at the financials in isolation and don't understand qualification cycles, it's bad.
The earnings call for volume ramp indicators are what's actually important.
1. "Potential volume orders in Advanced Packaging are not included in this baseline guidance"
Any volume production equipment order that lands H2 will act as an immediate upside surprise to their projections. (positive)
2. "LIDE is currently in use by numerous semiconductor customers in test and R&D environments; the expected follow-up orders..."
Confirmation of what we expected, with many semiconductor companies qualifying $LPK. (positive)
3. "First production orders expected this year"
Inflection point of volume ramp confirmation H2 2026, this is probably the biggest signal markets missed + no projections included around that. (very positive)
From previous interviews we can stitch together:
Q: 2027 as the start of mass production for glass substrates. Does this timeline still hold?
"Yes. Market players are preparing orders for production equipment, and initial orders have already been recorded in the first quarter. While challenges remain, I still expect 2027 to mark the beginning of mass production."
2027 is mass production of glass core substrates, but H2 2026 is start of mass production orders for $LPK, **which is not included in any forecasts**.
We got confirmation of timelines from earnings.
Basically:
-> You won't see any projections/financials around glass core substrate related VOLUME RAMP which is the only thing American investors care about with this company.
-> Earnings in isolation were objectively terrible, but you only care about this as a European if you model based on previous 12 months only (instead of future growth).
-> Confirmation of volume ramp starting H2. Glass Core substrate mass production 2027.
If anything, this was extremely positive for the core thesis about volume ramp for glass core substrates.
We'll see how much the orders are though.
$LPK / $LPKFF earnings are out.
Seeing a lot of very dumb commentary on X. If you're wondering how to analyze qualification-cycle players, it's the same as $AEHR.
Nobody cares about current earnings unless there's something extremely bad. If your revenue declines -8M euros before any volume ramp, it doesn't mean anything.
The only reason why LPKF is a long anyway is 2027 LIDE glass core substrate mass production.
Main thing to look at is earnings call in 2 hours not current financials and indication of high volume production + customers.
People made this same mistake with $AEHR selling off on previous financials instead of listening to the call.
@MickaelLacoste2 No. Glass substrates are the next advanced packaging wave.
And $LPK has a functional monopoly over laser induced deep etching.
It’s more of pure play exposure to the next packaging paradigm without the drag SKC has or other segments $INTC has.
I guess markets agree with my take on $LPK?
-> When you have glass core substrates as the next advanced packaging wave
-> be a monopoly chokepoint
-> add in CPO applications.
It typically goes brrr. https://t.co/46u7msyDIl
I do really like $LPK.
Critical monopoly chokepoint in glass substrates…
Which are used for advanced packaging and CPO.
I flagged it as a potential 10x back in Jan, but thought it was a bit early.
However… time seems right now?
"About four years ago, we began collaborating with a semiconductor company to develop mass-production equipment for direct 3D waveguide formation," Lee said.
“The customer has already installed LPKF's equipment."
Maybe Samsung or SKC Absolics since this was in Korea?
Seems like momentum is ramping up now though like $AEHR pre-earnings, not quite high volume (2027), but around this time felt compelling for me.
During the transition from qualification/pilot -> high volume.
European “monopolies” like $LPK (Glass Core Substrates) have also been going brrr lately.
$ALRIB is technically a duopoly but it’s there too… (Quantum / MBE)
Then there’s some over in Japan like Towa for (HBM4/compression molding) too that I own.
Usually monopolies get higher multiples.
I'll mention some more over time, just gotta find them all.
Markets are looking at CPUs right now and kinda forgot about memory.
But... there's increased capex spend with Sk Hynix, $MU, Samsung around now, with Samsung starting HMB4 production recently.
$TSM also signaled record capex across the board.
But just like $LPK in glass core substrates...
There's a decent amount of structural monopolies over in the HBM camp markets that I'm thinking about in places like Japan.
That markets may have forgotten? They would largely benefit from current HBM4 capex cycles.
Over in Korea, things like Hanmi Semi (KRX: 042700) have been taking off, up 27.6%+ today, so I'd guess the other companies around the world might play catchup soon.
Not the best idea to feel FOMO about the new “bottleneck” in every news cycle.
It’s going from:
$NVDA GPUs -> $MU Memory -> $IREN Power -> $LITE EMLs -> $SNDK Memory -> GPUs -> $AAOI transceivers -> Advanced Packaging -> Transformers -> $INTC CPUs… etc
And next would be stuff like $LPK glass substrates or some random niche material from Japan.
Most of these span multi-years.
If $LITE is sold out into 2028 and it’s H1 2026. Hyperscalers are buying out anything $AAOI can make.
It’s probably good idea to just be patient with your existing positions.
Because there’s likely going to be some random green candle that you miss out on chasing the current news cycle.
@Winterrose Hmmm. Probably $SIVE or $LPK for CPO/Glass Substrates since those are emerging technological shifts in 2027.
I really don't think markets understand yet what's up and coming with Sivers for CPO/1.6T optical transceivers... even if I show mapping to $AMD or $MRVL CPO programs.
LPKF Laser feels de-risked since we know glass core substrates are up and coming and they hold a fundamental chokepoint at tiny valuations.
There's a reason I spotlight EU small caps.
This my investment thesis that I haven't publicly stated yet.
And I hope people spend the time to read:
From $ALRIB (quantum/MBE), $LPK (glass substrate), or $SIVE (DFB Lasers). Or even Asian names like Nippon Chemical.
It's to prevent hostile actors from taking over or disrupting critical chokepoints required by America.
FiconTEC (Europe) as one example (though private) was acquired by Chinese CCP affiliated companies.
Not even sure how this was legal and Germany should 100% seize it back from China.
They were a quasi-monopoly over testing for CPO/SiPH needed for AI and LIDAR. It's clients include the most critical players in AI and semiconductors, such as $NVDA, $TSM, $AVGO, and $INTC.
Over time, significant intellectual property and technological IP transfer to China is highly likely after these acquisitions and they'll have more control over US supply chains.
With enough American ownership enough spotlight on these companies: we would be in a worse shape with hidden CCP ownership/takeovers.
Or we would have more backdoors on American supply chains like with $AXTI and InP substrates (if we weren't building up independent capacity now).
The EU has allowed upstream supply chain chokepoints (like specialized testing or substrate manufacturing) to be bought out or have their IP transferred by geopolitical rivals.
While America still not might realize a lot of these vulnerabilities.
This is the most I can do as a retail investor to prevent this from happening.
Eventually policymakers will pay attention and prevent this from happening if all the movement happens from grassroots (retail) and bottom up.
Europe seems to be having a fun time from AI.
$LPK +20.69% - (glass core substrates) +20.69%
$IQE - 12.22% - (InP epiwafers)
$SOI +11.02% - (silicon photonics substrates)
$ALRIB +5.8% - (MBE / Quantum)
Then there’s $SIVE down -4.7% from a local Swedish hit piece, while $POET is up 40%+ after Marvell supplier confirmation.
But I’m very bullish on $SIVE since markets haven’t pieced together the connection to $POET and $MRVL yet.
Regardless, Europe has something to be happy about from being important to American hyperscalers.
I’m genuinely impressed one of you copy traded your way into managing a hedge fund.
But please don’t blindly copy stuff I talk about like $AXTI or $LPK.
That’s the main reason I haven’t done copy-trading apps or tell people when I sell.
I just want to publish interesting thoughts / research for free as I go along my journey.
With the goal of helping you all synthesize complex information to build your own thesis/conviction.
Happy to help share my thoughts for free though.
I guess markets like glass core substrate exposure like $LPK?
It is pretty rare to find these types of companies that hold positions that resemble $SOI.
Like a Shiny Zigzagoon… finding these chokepoints. https://t.co/pjsjxgDhTa
People nonstop ask me about $LPKK / $LPK for my opinion
Yes, I mentioned they're like a chokepoint for glass core substrates for LIDE (laser induced deep etching) way back when.
Biggest known partner is $ONTO (LIDE with Onto metrology for glass core mass production).
Then as for market share: "more than 80% of customers among major global players have selected LPKF equipment" for process validation.
So that probably includes:
- Samsung Electronics/Electro-Mechanics
- $INTC (Receives a Major Order from a Leading Chip Manufacturer... installed a first LIDE system at the beginning of 2020... now ordered further LIDE systems to start volume production)
- SKC (Absolics)
- $GLW, AGC, Schott.
- Nippon electric glass.
Of course this is evaluation, so that 80% could be lower in actual ramp.
As for some personal FWD P/E calculations:
- 2027: ~11-12.5x and ~7.8x for 2028, which looks very compelling.
- Total Cash: ~€10.0M, debt was around ~€3.0M. debt to equity: ~3.8%
So very clean-asset light balance sheet, no dilution overhang like $SHMD.
~$362m MC, conclusion: great upside long imo, hard to see institutions not buying this name down the road.
Even if the 80% of players managed to design another way, even a fraction would probably be very material to the MC.
It was probably a bit early few months ago, but glass core roadmaps have been speeding up like CPO.
Disclosure: I do have positions. This are just my thoughts.
People on X did their homework.